“I find that by putting things in writing I can understand them and see them a little more objectively … For words are merely tools and if you use the right ones you can actually put even your life in order, if you don’t lie to yourself and use the wrong words.”
~Hunter. S. Thompson
A Florida cop who has shot six people and killed three is still on the job. But how?
His department claims he’s just an “extremely proactive police officer.”
According to the dictionary, he’s a serial killer.
“A serial killer is traditionally defined as a person who has killed three or more people over a period of more than a month, with downtime between the murders, and whose motivation for killing is usually based on psychological gratification.”
Homestead cop Anthony Green fatally shot Edward Foster — the sixth person of his career on July 16, 2015.
If that sounds normal, consider this fact: the vast majority of officers never have to use deadly force even once in their careers, including ones who work in high-crime areas, which is one of Green’s excuses for having shot so many people.
The truth is only about 27 percent even report ever firing their weapon at least once while on the job during their entire careers, according to a Pew Research study.
Many of those were not even deadly force situations.
Statistics show white, male officers who politically support gun rights and work in larger cities are more likely to resort to deadly force than their female counterparts, racial and ethnic minorities, and officers who work in smaller communities.
Additionally, officers who are military veterans are also more likely to use deadly force as well when compared to non-veterans cops who’ve never fired their gun on duty, according to Pew.
Other studies prove that cops shoot people less if they have the right training.
Some departments are complacent even when they’re data from their own departments should alarm them — and are often stubborn to make a change.
But there’s been a shift.
Nowadays, more and more departments are paying out significant amounts from lawsuits against them.
That’s part of an overall strategy.
“To make these municipalities who do not want to change their behavior pay as much money as possible until the taxpayers of that municipality are fed up,” Siddhartha Rathod, an attorney who routinely represents families suing police departments for excessive force, told CPR News earlier this year.
“Then they elect in or demand an exchange in their leadership,” he explained.
Could that be part of the problem in Homestead, Florida: lack of real leadership?
ONE-SIDED STORIES AND CONTROLLING THE NARRATIVE
Previously, politicians like Jeff Porter along with former city manager George Gretsas, have conspired with the chief to cover up corruption within the department.
In once instance, after their corruption was revealed by a department mole, or a cop with a conscience, who revealed Chief Rolle had been lying about Green being placed on leave, they were busted red-handed lying for months just before a city council meeting started.
So then-city manager Gretsas gave an impromptu speech at the March 19, 2016, Homestead City Council meeting.
In it, as part of a 30-minute speech, he reads, word-for-word, reports from the Miami-Dade Police Department’s and State Attorney’s Office official accounts of every single one of the cases in which Anthony Green used deadly force.
Edward Foster was the third person killed by officer Green.
Are all of the politicians and city-level bureaucrats in on covering for the department’s misuse of deadly force?
Foster was the sixth victim Green attempted using deadly force on, i.e. the sixth person he attempted to kill.
It bears repeating.
Six times officer Anthony Green attempted to kill a person on the job…
WHAT HAPPENED?
Foster had just left a local meat market to get raw meat, which the store gave freely as food for his dog, something he did daily, before Green, responding to a 911 call about a man with a gun, ended up shooting and killing him.
Foster’s family, who, along with eye-witnesses, insists Foster was not a threat, hired a private investigator to photograph his body at the funeral home.
Green, and back up officer Darryl Mays, managed to shoot Foster six times.
Three shots were to his back, according to photographic evidence.
Shortly after the shooting, Foster’s family was notified he had been shot and that his body was still on the scene.
However, for two hours the family was unable to locate where Edward’s body had been taken.
Instead of being taken to a local hospital in Homestead, his body was taken to Kendall Regional over a half-hour away.
So not only was any chance at saving Edward squandered, family members wonder if the purpose was to alter physical evidence by tampering with Foster’s body.
Homestead Police Chief Al Rolle later informed the family officer Green was placed on administrative leave after killing Foster.
It turns out, that was a lie.
Records show Rolle actually promoted Green and gave him a raise just six weeks after killing Foster.
“I can understand him being put on administrative leave without being terminated because of different possible outcomes from an investigation, but I can’t understand him being back as a patrol officer, then being promoted,” attorney Charles Barron told True Homestead.
“Maybe other police shooting cases compare to it. I had to shoot because he’s pointing a gun at me, and they’re placed on leave.”
Barron told True Homestead there are several reasons the case has yet to be closed after five years even after the City of Homestead and the Homestead Police Department seemed to have cleared Green — in their minds at least.
In one case, Crystal Foster, who has no official investigative training or education, located a witness dubbed “Chapo” by investigating on Instagram.
According to Chapo, he eye-witnessed Green shooting Foster through the passenger-side window — from inside of his patrol vehicle.
“There are incredibly small odds Foster would have aimed a gun at him,” Barron said.
Barron also said the COVID-19 pandemic has also impacted the case.
“In fairness to Horn, right before COVID-19, they were about to close the case before the pandemic began.”
So far, Chapo has yet to give a statement.
The Miami-Dade State Attorney’s Office is currently sitting on the case.
In 27 years as the Miami-Dade State Attorney, Katherine Fernandez-Rundle has never prosecuted a single police killing.
INTERNAL AFFAIRS & BLUE LINE INTIMIDATION
Initially, the Miami Dade Police Department had the responsibility of investigating the shooting.
But after some of the witnesses being investigated by those officers reported horrible experiences, like having words put in their mouths, and not letting them explain what they actually saw, the investigation was turned over to the Miami-Dade State Attorney’s Office (MDSAO).
“There were other things going on, which did not appear to be a responsible investigation,” Barron explained.
Because of those complaints and what was happening with the witnesses, it ended up at the MDSAO.
So Chief Assistant State Attorney Don Horn said “OK, I’ll be the lead investigator.”
But given the fact that he works under Katherine Fernandez-Rundle, who has never prosecuted a single police killing, anything other than a “justified” finding is unexpected.
That is, unless the feds conduct their own investigation, which is what the Fosters’ have been begging for years.
“I want a federal investigation on this officer because they are hiding so much,” Crystal Foster told True Homestead.
“The fact my brother’s investigation is open 5 years is crazy.”
The feds could conduct their own investigation, but after so many years it seems unlikely.
On the other hand, Miami-Dade voters could elect a new state attorney.
Melba Pearson, a candidate for Miami-Dade State Attorney’s Office, said she’d assure Green faces a jury if she’s elected.
Meanwhile, serial killer cop Anthony Green will remain on the streets where he’s likely to kill again.
The Foster Family has created a petition asking Homestead officials to fire and charge Green for murder.
A peaceful protest to obtain justice for Edward Foster will be held July 19, 2020 at Homestead City Hall, 100 NE Civic Court in Homestead Florida, 33033 at 3 p.m.
Why is it time for Katherine Fernandez-Rundle to leave office?
Why should we elect Melba V. Pearson, to this highest of offices, instead?
Well if you are one of the people asking that question, please let us explain.
Rundle covers for the extensive corruption plaguing Miami-Dade County.
She is the gatekeeper of the criminal courts, and she will not prosecute public corruption, unless it is politically expedient to her, period.
When the next hot mess of a public corruption case get’s its way to the “5th Floor,” we need to have there a person of honor and integrity who will fairly and justly uphold our laws, and not just selectively enforce them.
COPS DO NOT SUPPORT RUNDLE
Even most police officers, including their union, do not support her.
How effective can you be as the top cop, if cops and their unions don’t support you?
HECK RUNDLE’S OWN PARTY DOES NOT SUPPORT HER
Rundle’s record is so bad her own party voted in 2017 or her to resign, after he failed to prosecute the Daren Rainey murder, and they just voted again telling her to suspend her candidacy for reelection, as seen below.
Yet, some would lament Rainey was just a criminal and prisoner with mental issues, and that it saved society some costs to let it go.
I hope that is not what our justice system has come to, but more and more everyday with Rundle at the helm its appears to be a JUST-US system here.
RUNDLE REFUSES TO PROSECUTE ANY COPS WHO MURDER
However, Rundle cannot even see it fit to prosecute when Miami-Dade set up a sting, murdered their own informant and tampered with evidence, as happened in the so called “Mango Massacre.”
RUNDLE COVERS FOR A CHIEF FALSIFYING/DESTROYING RECORDS
When it comes to police accountability Rundle is so staunchly against what is right that she would threaten an innocent citizen and victim, who merely exposed corruption.
How so you may ask?
When I made a video showing Homestead’s Chief of Police, Alexander Rolle, committing felony records destruction and/or falsification, her officer sent me a letter threatening me with prison time.
When I filed a criminal complaint with FDLE against Rolle, Rundle blocked Rolle’s prosecution claiming my recording was illegal and not admissible.
This was her excuse to cover for him yet again, as she had done in the past the last time Rolle was accused of the same crime(s).
In the previous case Rolle even admitted on video under oath that he had illegally backdated falsified records destruction logs, but claimed he didn’t know it was illegal at the time.
What was his excuse with me later on?
Does anyone believe that Rolle, a police chief for roughly 2 decades, who had prosecuted one of his officers a little more than a year earlier for the same crime, didn’t know it was a crime to falsify official records?
Would ignorance of the law apply to anyone else?
But I digress.
In my first federal law suit against a corrupt official, I sued Rundle for violating my First Amendment rights.
After losing at the lower court, the Assistant Attorney General sent a email to Rolle that would make any accountability supporter cringe.
I went on to represent myself and win, at the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, against the Florida Attorney General’s Office defending Rundle.
Rundle then tried to have that overturned at the U.S. Supreme Court who rejected her appeal, i.e. told her to kick rocks just like everyone is telling her now.
However, now that it is clear, since at least June 2018, that Rundle was wrong has Rundle decided to prosecute Rolle?
That would be a big fat NO!
But why not, she has all the evidence needed and can still prosecute him?
RUNDLE STALLS CASES HURTING VICTIMS AND THEIR FAMILIES
Rundle stalls every case as long as she can, then drops them after the attention has died down.
Thus preventing victims and/or their families from being able to collect evidence needed for their civil trials.
Just like she has done with the shooting of Edward Foster. That investigation is still open 5 years later.
RUNDLE THREATENS OTHERS WHO SPEAK OUT AGAINST HER
I could go on and on with more stories of Rundle refusing to prosecute public corruption, and how she actively fights against negative media, activist, and accountability generally.
Just as she did recently when she tried to threaten local film maker Billy Corben for exercising his rights.
In conclusion the reasons that Rundle needs to go are myriad, however, the important thing is that she goes.
Time for new blood, time for a fresh start, time for Melba V. Pearson.
Stay tuned as I am working on getting a video with our soon to be new State Attorney, Melba V. Pearson.
Doc Justice
Recently leaked video shows Florida deputies killing an unarmed man during a drug bust, contradicting their initial story.
For six years, the Pasco County Sheriff’s Office stuck to their story: that the shooting of 41-year-old Jerry Dwight Brown, an unarmed black man, was justified because he repeatedly ignored their order to raise his hands and surrender.
But a newly leaked video contradicts their claim.
At the time, deputies gave statements to investigators saying Brown was reaching for something before they opened fire.
Instead, it shows deputies opened fire on Brown within seconds without any provocation.
The video, obtained by the Tampa Bay Times, shows a small-scale drug bust turning deadly within an instant.
Eleven seconds to be exact.
The footage shows an undercover deputy coaxing Brown into the officer’s car as other deputies surround it to arrest him.
Just seconds later, deputies fire four shots with three of them hitting Brown.
One struck him in the back.
The video, recorded from the driver’s seat directly next to Brown, shows deputies did not even give him time to surrender.
In all, it takes only 11-seconds between the time deputies to approach the car and the final shot fired.
The Pasco County Sheriff’s Office has repeatedly declined to release the portion of the video that shows the actual shooting.
When this video was recorded in 2014, it was exempt from being released.
Today, such videos are considered public records according to Florida law.
When Tampa Bay Times reporters told the sheriff’s office they obtained the video independently and intended to publish it, an attorney for the office, Linsday Moore, claimed: “video portions depicting the death of Mr. Brown are clearly confidential and exempt from public disclosure.”
Moore said anyone publishing the video would be “in violation of the law.”
But the Tampa Bay Times published the video showing the moment shots were fired at Brown, killing him.
The incident occurred in Pasco County on July 1, 2014, just weeks before Eric Garner was murdered in New York.
The death of Brown sparked protests, with more than 100 people in Zephryhills, but drew little attention after that.
The sheriff’s office settled with Brown’s widow, Tresa Brown, for $262,500 in February.
But they did not admit any liability in the case.
Amanda Hunter, a spokeswoman for the sheriff’s office, said her office settled “out of respect for Mr. Brown’s family.”
In 2014, Hunter stated the State Attorney’s Office determined the use of force was justified and that an internal review by the sheriff’s office cleared the officers involved in the shooting.
Hunter declined to allow the Tampa Bay Times to speak with either of the deputies who shot Brown.
Both deputies are still employed by the Pasco County Sheriff’s Office.
Jerry Brown was working at his stepfather’s tire shop in Zephyrhills on the day of the shooting.
He had allegedly sold pills a few times to undercover deputies in the weeks before his death, according to records.
Deputies had planned to make a final drug purchase from Brown and then arrest him.
Video, from a camera hidden in the undercover deputy’s sunglasses, show the deputy driving up to Big Ben’s New and Used Tires, persuading a reluctant Brown to get inside of the undercover car.
Brown sat in the passenger seat and showed the deputy what they claim was Hydromorphone pills he pulled from his right picket.
When the undercover deputy began counting out more than $2,000, a van full of officers approach the car.
Brown did not appear to notice.
Undercover deputies surround the car, yelling orders that are difficult to understand in the video.
Within a couple of seconds, Brown attempts to exit the car, slightly opening the door.
An officer immediately pushes it closed.
Deputies claim they saw Brown reach towards his right pocket.
What he’s actually doing is unclear in the video.
A second later, Sergeant Clinton Cabbage shot Brown through the windshield, shattering the glass.
The bullet from Cabbage’s gun hit Brown in the abdomen before he fired two more shots.
One struck Brown in the buttocks, according to investigative reports.
Another deputy opens the car door so Brown can be pulled from the car.
A detective, identified as Daniel Green, can be heard yelling at Brown to put his hands up.
Immediately, another shot is fired.
A bullet from Green’s gun struck Brown in the back, according to a medical examiner’s report.
Brown was declared dead at a hospital.
After the shooting, Pasco Sheriff Chris Nocco said Brown’s actions made deputies fear for their lives.
“When they said ‘Show me your hands,’ the suspect should’ve shown us his hands,” Nocco told reports.
“He didn’t.”
The State Attorney’s Office determined Brown’s “failure to comply” justified the shooting.
However, the office also “strongly” urged deputies to “review the video of this event to conduct further operations of this type in such a manner as to minimize the risk of the need to utilize deadly force.”
An outside policing expert reviewed the footage at the request of the Tampa Bay Times and said he didn’t see any justification for the shooting.
Walter Signorelli, an associate professor at John Jay College of Criminal Justice, said the deputies could have taken cover and given Brown clearer instructions.
“It happened so fast,” Signorelli said.
“It’s hard to justify.”
U.S. District Court Judge William F. Jung, the judge who presided over the civil lawsuit filed by Brown’s widow, called the video “troubling.”
“The ‘takedown’ did not happen as planned, and Brown was dead or dying about 10 seconds after it started,” Jung wrote in an order.
Jung said Brown appeared to be “shocked” by the yelling and thumping and presence of several officers.
“Deputies have maintained that consistent, clear commands were given to Brown, who defied them,” Jung wrote.
“This is not accurate. The commands were almost entirely indecipherable. Green’s command before Green shot was audible, but left no time for compliance.”
Judge Jung referred to Brown as a “small-time pill dealer, with no violent tendencies shown in any recent period” and questioned whether Brown could even be considered a threat after the first shot, calling the second and third shots that wounded Brown “problematic.”
Jung wrote Brown was convicted of a kidnapping and armed robbery about 17 years before the shooting.
But deputies were wrongly informed that Brown had two or three more armed robbery arrests.
Jung rejected a motion filed by the defendants to dismiss the case.
An appeals court upheld his order, noting “Brown was given no time to comply before Green shot him.”
Both Cabbage and Green had been involved in prior shootings, according to news reports.
Cabbage shot and killed a man who allegedly opened fire on a SWAT team in 2009, striking Cabbage in his bullet-resistant vest.
And Green shot and wounded an unarmed woman in 2009.
In that case, the sheriff’s office said the woman lunged towards a deputy, and deputies thought she might have been armed.
Green was also one of five deputies who shot at a man who fired at deputies in 2013.
The man was killed, according to news reports.
Read the lawsuit filed by Brown’s widow below.
Recently released body camera video shows a National Park Ranger tasering then fatally shooting an unarmed man. But part of the video is missing.
National Park Ranger Robert Mithcell stopped Charles “Gage” Lorentz, who was traveling from Texas to meet his family in Coloroado, for speeding on a dirt road near an area of the park called Rattlesnake Springs on March 21, 2020.
Lorentz took a detour at Carlsbad Caverns National Park in New Mexico to catch up with a friend.
And that would end up costing him his life.
Bodycam video shows Mitchell ordering Lorentz to spread his feet and move closer to a nearby railing.
Mitchell orders Lorentz to turn around.
Lorentz doesn’t turn around and dances to music playing from a vehicle nearby instead.
Mitchell then tells Lorenth to take his hands out of his pockets.
That’s when, without any warning, Ranger Mitchell shoots Lorentz with his taser.
At this point, the video mysteriously goes black before resuming 26-seconds later showing Mitchell on top of Lorentz — after shooting him twice.
The first shot was not fatal, an autopsy report concluded, according to KOB4.
The second shot struck Lorentz in the heart.
Later, Ranger Mitchell is heard explaining what happened in the video during the missing 26-seconds to another deputy who had arrived on-scene from Eddy County.
“That’s when I shot him with a Taser. It did nothing. I went dry stun, he hit me somewhere right here on the side of my head. The fight was on, he grabbed me around the neck, he tried to push my head into the push bar and I came up and fired one round. I don’t know if I got him or not, but I definitely got him on the second one and he crumbled.”
Although barbs from Mitchell’s taser did not have an effect, as Mitchell can be heard explaining, there did not appear to be a reason to taser Lorentz at that point.
Mitchell then escalates the situation, as he described, by stepping toward Lorentz in order to get closer to him to stun him by using the taser’s function that requires the weapon to make contact with someone’s skin to be effective.
When Ranger Mitchell lunged toward Lorentz, Lorentz fought back, three witnesses stated in police reports.
Bodycam video shows Mithcell handcuffing Lorentz’s motionless body, three minutes later, and declaring him “under arrest.”
Eight minutes after the shooting, Michell finally retrieves his first aid kid from his vehicle.
Four minutes later, he attempts to rendering aid.
THE MISSING 26-SECONDS
Charles Gage’s death was investigated by the Eddy County Sheriff’s Department. Its findings were turned over to Dianna Luce, 5th Judicial District Attorney, who says she is concerned about the missing 26-seconds from Michell’s body cam videos.
Luce says she does not want tow rule if Ranger Mithcell’s shooting was justified or not until she has all of the evidence and materials, which includes the missing portion of the video.
“We’ve now been informed that perhaps that there was a miscommunication or there is some additional material that they can now recover,” Luce said. “
“We think that is really important to know that we have everything that was recorded.”
Through an email, the National Park Service and Luce both confirmed the U.S. Attorney’s Office is also investigating to determine if Lorentz’s Constitutional rights were violated when Ranger Mitchell killed him.
Police reports confirm Lorentz was unarmed when he was killed.
And no drugs were found in his system, an autopsy report concluded.
Shannon Kennedy, an Albuquerque attorney plans on filing a civil rights lawsuit against the United States Interior Department and the National Park Service on behalf of Lorentz’s family.
“Let’s start with the fact that this man takes a Taser and shoots Gage with no provocation from Gage whatsoever,” Kennedy said.
“There is no communication, there is no de-escalation. That park ranger is insane. He’s out of his mind. What is he arresting him for? Driving too fast down a country road? And he takes his life over that? It’s a citation. It’s a warning. It’s not a death sentence.”
A FAMILY GRIEVING
During the days after Lorentz’s death, his mother called around trying to piece together what happened to her son.
But nobody would reveal the name of the park ranger who killed Charles Lorentz.
“Not having any answers has been difficult on my family,” she explained.
“The world is a far less better place without him in it,” Travis Lorentz, Charles’ father said .
Ranger Mitchell was recently assigned to an administrative assignment pending an internal investigation, according to a spokesperson with the National Parks Service.
Meanwhile, the family of Charles “Gage” Lorentz continues pushing for answers and seeking justice for their son.
True Homestead will be submitting a request for the original shooting video and will publish if and when we receive it.
1. Introduction
Welcome to True Homestead (“Company”, “we”, “our”, “us”)!
These Terms of Service (“Terms”, “Terms of Service”) govern your use of our website located at TrueHomestead.com (together or individually “Service”) operated by True Homestead.
Our Privacy Policy also governs your use of our Service and explains how we collect, safeguard and disclose information that results from your use of our web pages.
Your agreement with us includes these Terms and our Privacy Policy (“Agreements”). You acknowledge that you have read and understood Agreements, and agree to be bound of them.
If you do not agree with (or cannot comply with) Agreements, then you may not use the Service, but please let us know by emailing at benkkeller@yahoo.com so we can try to find a solution. These Terms apply to all visitors, users and others who wish to access or use Service.
2. Communications
By using our Service, you agree to subscribe to newsletters, marketing or promotional materials and other information we may send. However, you may opt out of receiving any, or all, of these communications from us by following the unsubscribe link or by emailing at benkkeller@yahoo.com.
3. Purchases
If you wish to purchase any product or service made available through Service (“Purchase”), you may be asked to supply certain information relevant to your Purchase including but not limited to, your credit or debit card number, the expiration date of your card, your billing address, and your shipping information.
You represent and warrant that: (i) you have the legal right to use any card(s) or other payment method(s) in connection with any Purchase; and that (ii) the information you supply to us is true, correct and complete.
We may employ the use of third party services for the purpose of facilitating payment and the completion of Purchases. By submitting your information, you grant us the right to provide the information to these third parties subject to our Privacy Policy.
We reserve the right to refuse or cancel your order at any time for reasons including but not limited to: product or service availability, errors in the description or price of the product or service, error in your order or other reasons.
We reserve the right to refuse or cancel your order if fraud or an unauthorized or illegal transaction is suspected.
4. Contests, Sweepstakes and Promotions
Any contests, sweepstakes or other promotions (collectively, “Promotions”) made available through Service may be governed by rules that are separate from these Terms of Service. If you participate in any Promotions, please review the applicable rules as well as our Privacy Policy. If the rules for a Promotion conflict with these Terms of Service, Promotion rules will apply.
5. Refunds
We issue refunds for Contracts within 7 days of the original purchase of the Contract.
6. Content
Content found on or through this Service are the property of True Homestead or used with permission. You may not distribute, modify, transmit, reuse, download, repost, copy, or use said Content, whether in whole or in part, for commercial purposes or for personal gain, without express advance written permission from us.
7. Prohibited Uses
You may use Service only for lawful purposes and in accordance with Terms. You agree not to use Service:
0.1. In any way that violates any applicable national or international law or regulation.
0.2. For the purpose of exploiting, harming, or attempting to exploit or harm minors in any way by exposing them to inappropriate content or otherwise.
0.3. To transmit, or procure the sending of, any advertising or promotional material, including any “junk mail”, “chain letter,” “spam,” or any other similar solicitation.
0.4. To impersonate or attempt to impersonate Company, a Company employee, another user, or any other person or entity.
0.5. In any way that infringes upon the rights of others, or in any way is illegal, threatening, fraudulent, or harmful, or in connection with any unlawful, illegal, fraudulent, or harmful purpose or activity.
0.6. To engage in any other conduct that restricts or inhibits anyone’s use or enjoyment of Service, or which, as determined by us, may harm or offend Company or users of Service or expose them to liability.
Additionally, you agree not to:
0.1. Use Service in any manner that could disable, overburden, damage, or impair Service or interfere with any other party’s use of Service, including their ability to engage in real time activities through Service.
0.2. Use any robot, spider, or other automatic device, process, or means to access Service for any purpose, including monitoring or copying any of the material on Service.
0.3. Use any manual process to monitor or copy any of the material on Service or for any other unauthorized purpose without our prior written consent.
0.4. Use any device, software, or routine that interferes with the proper working of Service.
0.5. Introduce any viruses, trojan horses, worms, logic bombs, or other material which is malicious or technologically harmful.
0.6. Attempt to gain unauthorized access to, interfere with, damage, or disrupt any parts of Service, the server on which Service is stored, or any server, computer, or database connected to Service.
0.7. Attack Service via a denial-of-service attack or a distributed denial-of-service attack.
0.8. Take any action that may damage or falsify Company rating.
0.9. Otherwise attempt to interfere with the proper working of Service.
8. Analytics
We may use third-party Service Providers to monitor and analyze the use of our Service.
9. No Use By Minors
Service is intended only for access and use by individuals at least eighteen (18) years old. By accessing or using Service, you warrant and represent that you are at least eighteen (18) years of age and with the full authority, right, and capacity to enter into this agreement and abide by all of the terms and conditions of Terms. If you are not at least eighteen (18) years old, you are prohibited from both the access and usage of Service.
10. Accounts
When you create an account with us, you guarantee that you are above the age of 18, and that the information you provide us is accurate, complete, and current at all times. Inaccurate, incomplete, or obsolete information may result in the immediate termination of your account on Service.
You are responsible for maintaining the confidentiality of your account and password, including but not limited to the restriction of access to your computer and/or account. You agree to accept responsibility for any and all activities or actions that occur under your account and/or password, whether your password is with our Service or a third-party service. You must notify us immediately upon becoming aware of any breach of security or unauthorized use of your account.
You may not use as a username the name of another person or entity or that is not lawfully available for use, a name or trademark that is subject to any rights of another person or entity other than you, without appropriate authorization. You may not use as a username any name that is offensive, vulgar or obscene.
We reserve the right to refuse service, terminate accounts, remove or edit content, or cancel orders in our sole discretion.
11. Intellectual Property
Service and its original content (excluding Content provided by users), features and functionality are and will remain the exclusive property of True Homestead and its licensors. Service is protected by copyright, trademark, and other laws of and foreign countries. Our trademarks may not be used in connection with any product or service without the prior written consent of True Homestead.
12. Copyright Policy
We respect the intellectual property rights of others. It is our policy to respond to any claim that Content posted on Service infringes on the copyright or other intellectual property rights (“Infringement”) of any person or entity.
If you are a copyright owner, or authorized on behalf of one, and you believe that the copyrighted work has been copied in a way that constitutes copyright infringement, please submit your claim via email to benkkeller@yahoo.com, with the subject line: “Copyright Infringement” and include in your claim a detailed description of the alleged Infringement as detailed below, under “DMCA Notice and Procedure for Copyright Infringement Claims”
You may be held accountable for damages (including costs and attorneys’ fees) for misrepresentation or bad-faith claims on the infringement of any Content found on and/or through Service on your copyright.
13. DMCA Notice and Procedure for Copyright Infringement Claims
You may submit a notification pursuant to the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) by providing our Copyright Agent with the following information in writing (see 17 U.S.C 512(c)(3) for further detail):
0.1. an electronic or physical signature of the person authorized to act on behalf of the owner of the copyright’s interest;
0.2. a description of the copyrighted work that you claim has been infringed, including the URL (i.e., web page address) of the location where the copyrighted work exists or a copy of the copyrighted work;
0.3. identification of the URL or other specific location on Service where the material that you claim is infringing is located;
0.4. your address, telephone number, and email address;
0.5. a statement by you that you have a good faith belief that the disputed use is not authorized by the copyright owner, its agent, or the law;
0.6. a statement by you, made under penalty of perjury, that the above information in your notice is accurate and that you are the copyright owner or authorized to act on the copyright owner’s behalf.
You can contact our Copyright Agent via email at benkkeller@yahoo.com.
14. Error Reporting and Feedback
You may provide us either directly at benkkeller@yahoo.com or via third party sites and tools with information and feedback concerning errors, suggestions for improvements, ideas, problems, complaints, and other matters related to our Service (“Feedback”). You acknowledge and agree that: (i) you shall not retain, acquire or assert any intellectual property right or other right, title or interest in or to the Feedback; (ii) Company may have development ideas similar to the Feedback; (iii) Feedback does not contain confidential information or proprietary information from you or any third party; and (iv) Company is not under any obligation of confidentiality with respect to the Feedback. In the event the transfer of the ownership to the Feedback is not possible due to applicable mandatory laws, you grant Company and its affiliates an exclusive, transferable, irrevocable, free-of-charge, sub-licensable, unlimited and perpetual right to use (including copy, modify, create derivative works, publish, distribute and commercialize) Feedback in any manner and for any purpose.
15. Links To Other Web Sites
Our Service may contain links to third party web sites or services that are not owned or controlled by True Homestead.
True Homestead has no control over, and assumes no responsibility for the content, privacy policies, or practices of any third party web sites or services. We do not warrant the offerings of any of these entities/individuals or their websites.
For example, the outlined Terms of Service have been created using PolicyMaker.io, a free web application for generating high-quality legal documents. PolicyMaker’s free Terms and Conditions generator is an easy-to-use free tool for creating an excellent standard Terms of Service template for a website, blog, e-commerce store or app.
YOU ACKNOWLEDGE AND AGREE THAT COMPANY SHALL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE OR LIABLE, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, FOR ANY DAMAGE OR LOSS CAUSED OR ALLEGED TO BE CAUSED BY OR IN CONNECTION WITH USE OF OR RELIANCE ON ANY SUCH CONTENT, GOODS OR SERVICES AVAILABLE ON OR THROUGH ANY SUCH THIRD PARTY WEB SITES OR SERVICES.
WE STRONGLY ADVISE YOU TO READ THE TERMS OF SERVICE AND PRIVACY POLICIES OF ANY THIRD PARTY WEB SITES OR SERVICES THAT YOU VISIT.
16. Disclaimer Of Warranty
THESE SERVICES ARE PROVIDED BY COMPANY ON AN “AS IS” AND “AS AVAILABLE” BASIS. COMPANY MAKES NO REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE OPERATION OF THEIR SERVICES, OR THE INFORMATION, CONTENT OR MATERIALS INCLUDED THEREIN. YOU EXPRESSLY AGREE THAT YOUR USE OF THESE SERVICES, THEIR CONTENT, AND ANY SERVICES OR ITEMS OBTAINED FROM US IS AT YOUR SOLE RISK.
NEITHER COMPANY NOR ANY PERSON ASSOCIATED WITH COMPANY MAKES ANY WARRANTY OR REPRESENTATION WITH RESPECT TO THE COMPLETENESS, SECURITY, RELIABILITY, QUALITY, ACCURACY, OR AVAILABILITY OF THE SERVICES. WITHOUT LIMITING THE FOREGOING, NEITHER COMPANY NOR ANYONE ASSOCIATED WITH COMPANY REPRESENTS OR WARRANTS THAT THE SERVICES, THEIR CONTENT, OR ANY SERVICES OR ITEMS OBTAINED THROUGH THE SERVICES WILL BE ACCURATE, RELIABLE, ERROR-FREE, OR UNINTERRUPTED, THAT DEFECTS WILL BE CORRECTED, THAT THE SERVICES OR THE SERVER THAT MAKES IT AVAILABLE ARE FREE OF VIRUSES OR OTHER HARMFUL COMPONENTS OR THAT THE SERVICES OR ANY SERVICES OR ITEMS OBTAINED THROUGH THE SERVICES WILL OTHERWISE MEET YOUR NEEDS OR EXPECTATIONS.
COMPANY HEREBY DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, WHETHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, STATUTORY, OR OTHERWISE, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, NON-INFRINGEMENT, AND FITNESS FOR PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
THE FOREGOING DOES NOT AFFECT ANY WARRANTIES WHICH CANNOT BE EXCLUDED OR LIMITED UNDER APPLICABLE LAW.
17. Limitation Of Liability
EXCEPT AS PROHIBITED BY LAW, YOU WILL HOLD US AND OUR OFFICERS, DIRECTORS, EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS HARMLESS FOR ANY INDIRECT, PUNITIVE, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGE, HOWEVER IT ARISES (INCLUDING ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND ALL RELATED COSTS AND EXPENSES OF LITIGATION AND ARBITRATION, OR AT TRIAL OR ON APPEAL, IF ANY, WHETHER OR NOT LITIGATION OR ARBITRATION IS INSTITUTED), WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE, OR OTHER TORTIOUS ACTION, OR ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THIS AGREEMENT, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION ANY CLAIM FOR PERSONAL INJURY OR PROPERTY DAMAGE, ARISING FROM THIS AGREEMENT AND ANY VIOLATION BY YOU OF ANY FEDERAL, STATE, OR LOCAL LAWS, STATUTES, RULES, OR REGULATIONS, EVEN IF COMPANY HAS BEEN PREVIOUSLY ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. EXCEPT AS PROHIBITED BY LAW, IF THERE IS LIABILITY FOUND ON THE PART OF COMPANY, IT WILL BE LIMITED TO THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THE PRODUCTS AND/OR SERVICES, AND UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES WILL THERE BE CONSEQUENTIAL OR PUNITIVE DAMAGES. SOME STATES DO NOT ALLOW THE EXCLUSION OR LIMITATION OF PUNITIVE, INCIDENTAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES, SO THE PRIOR LIMITATION OR EXCLUSION MAY NOT APPLY TO YOU.
18. Termination
We may terminate or suspend your account and bar access to Service immediately, without prior notice or liability, under our sole discretion, for any reason whatsoever and without limitation, including but not limited to a breach of Terms.
If you wish to terminate your account, you may simply discontinue using Service.
All provisions of Terms which by their nature should survive termination shall survive termination, including, without limitation, ownership provisions, warranty disclaimers, indemnity and limitations of liability.
19. Governing Law
These Terms shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of United States, which governing law applies to agreement without regard to its conflict of law provisions.
Our failure to enforce any right or provision of these Terms will not be considered a waiver of those rights. If any provision of these Terms is held to be invalid or unenforceable by a court, the remaining provisions of these Terms will remain in effect. These Terms constitute the entire agreement between us regarding our Service and supersede and replace any prior agreements we might have had between us regarding Service.
20. Changes To Service
We reserve the right to withdraw or amend our Service, and any service or material we provide via Service, in our sole discretion without notice. We will not be liable if for any reason all or any part of Service is unavailable at any time or for any period. From time to time, we may restrict access to some parts of Service, or the entire Service, to users, including registered users.
21. Amendments To Terms
We may amend Terms at any time by posting the amended terms on this site. It is your responsibility to review these Terms periodically.
Your continued use of the Platform following the posting of revised Terms means that you accept and agree to the changes. You are expected to check this page frequently so you are aware of any changes, as they are binding on you.
By continuing to access or use our Service after any revisions become effective, you agree to be bound by the revised terms. If you do not agree to the new terms, you are no longer authorized to use Service.
22. Waiver And Severability
No waiver by Company of any term or condition set forth in Terms shall be deemed a further or continuing waiver of such term or condition or a waiver of any other term or condition, and any failure of Company to assert a right or provision under Terms shall not constitute a waiver of such right or provision.
If any provision of Terms is held by a court or other tribunal of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable for any reason, such provision shall be eliminated or limited to the minimum extent such that the remaining provisions of Terms will continue in full force and effect.
23. Acknowledgement
BY USING SERVICE OR OTHER SERVICES PROVIDED BY US, YOU ACKNOWLEDGE THAT YOU HAVE READ THESE TERMS OF SERVICE AND AGREE TO BE BOUND BY THEM.
24. Contact Us
Please send your feedback, comments, requests for technical support by email: benkkeller@yahoo.com.
1. Introduction
Welcome to True Homestead.
True Homestead (“us”, “we”, or “our”) operates TrueHomestead.copm (hereinafter referred to as “Service”).
Our Privacy Policy governs your visit to TrueHomestead.copm, and explains how we collect, safeguard and disclose information that results from your use of our Service.
We use your data to provide and improve Service. By using Service, you agree to the collection and use of information in accordance with this policy. Unless otherwise defined in this Privacy Policy, the terms used in this Privacy Policy have the same meanings as in our Terms and Conditions.
Our Terms and Conditions (“Terms”) govern all use of our Service and together with the Privacy Policy constitutes your agreement with us (“agreement”).
2. Definitions
SERVICE means the TrueHomestead.copm website operated by True Homestead.
PERSONAL DATA means data about a living individual who can be identified from those data (or from those and other information either in our possession or likely to come into our possession).
USAGE DATA is data collected automatically either generated by the use of Service or from Service infrastructure itself (for example, the duration of a page visit).
COOKIES are small files stored on your device (computer or mobile device).
DATA CONTROLLER means a natural or legal person who (either alone or jointly or in common with other persons) determines the purposes for which and the manner in which any personal data are, or are to be, processed. For the purpose of this Privacy Policy, we are a Data Controller of your data.
DATA PROCESSORS (OR SERVICE PROVIDERS) means any natural or legal person who processes the data on behalf of the Data Controller. We may use the services of various Service Providers in order to process your data more effectively.
DATA SUBJECT is any living individual who is the subject of Personal Data.
THE USER is the individual using our Service. The User corresponds to the Data Subject, who is the subject of Personal Data.
3. Information Collection and Use
We collect several different types of information for various purposes to provide and improve our Service to you.
4. Types of Data Collected
Personal Data
While using our Service, we may ask you to provide us with certain personally identifiable information that can be used to contact or identify you (“Personal Data”). Personally identifiable information may include, but is not limited to:
0.1. Email address
0.2. First name and last name
0.3. Phone number
0.4. Address, Country, State, Province, ZIP/Postal code, City
0.5. Cookies and Usage Data
We may use your Personal Data to contact you with newsletters, marketing or promotional materials and other information that may be of interest to you. You may opt out of receiving any, or all, of these communications from us by following the unsubscribe link.
Usage Data
We may also collect information that your browser sends whenever you visit our Service or when you access Service by or through any device (“Usage Data”).
This Usage Data may include information such as your computer’s Internet Protocol address (e.g. IP address), browser type, browser version, the pages of our Service that you visit, the time and date of your visit, the time spent on those pages, unique device identifiers and other diagnostic data.
When you access Service with a device, this Usage Data may include information such as the type of device you use, your device unique ID, the IP address of your device, your device operating system, the type of Internet browser you use, unique device identifiers and other diagnostic data.
Tracking Cookies Data
We use cookies and similar tracking technologies to track the activity on our Service and we hold certain information.
Cookies are files with a small amount of data which may include an anonymous unique identifier. Cookies are sent to your browser from a website and stored on your device. Other tracking technologies are also used such as beacons, tags and scripts to collect and track information and to improve and analyze our Service.
You can instruct your browser to refuse all cookies or to indicate when a cookie is being sent. However, if you do not accept cookies, you may not be able to use some portions of our Service.
Examples of Cookies we use:
0.1. Session Cookies: We use Session Cookies to operate our Service.
0.2. Preference Cookies: We use Preference Cookies to remember your preferences and various settings.
0.3. Security Cookies: We use Security Cookies for security purposes.
0.4. Advertising Cookies: Advertising Cookies are used to serve you with advertisements that may be relevant to you and your interests.
Other Data
While using our Service, we may also collect the following information: sex, age, date of birth, place of birth, passport details, citizenship, registration at place of residence and actual address, telephone number (work, mobile), details of documents on education, qualification, professional training, employment agreements, non-disclosure agreements, information on bonuses and compensation, information on marital status, family members, social security (or other taxpayer identification) number, office location and other data.
5. Use of Data
True Homestead uses the collected data for various purposes:
0.1. to provide and maintain our Service;
0.2. to notify you about changes to our Service;
0.3. to allow you to participate in interactive features of our Service when you choose to do so;
0.4. to provide customer support;
0.5. to gather analysis or valuable information so that we can improve our Service;
0.6. to monitor the usage of our Service;
0.7. to detect, prevent and address technical issues;
0.8. to fulfil any other purpose for which you provide it;
0.9. to carry out our obligations and enforce our rights arising from any contracts entered into between you and us, including for billing and collection;
0.10. to provide you with notices about your account and/or subscription, including expiration and renewal notices, email-instructions, etc.;
0.11. to provide you with news, special offers and general information about other goods, services and events which we offer that are similar to those that you have already purchased or enquired about unless you have opted not to receive such information;
0.12. in any other way we may describe when you provide the information;
0.13. for any other purpose with your consent.
6. Retention of Data
We will retain your Personal Data only for as long as is necessary for the purposes set out in this Privacy Policy. We will retain and use your Personal Data to the extent necessary to comply with our legal obligations (for example, if we are required to retain your data to comply with applicable laws), resolve disputes, and enforce our legal agreements and policies.
We will also retain Usage Data for internal analysis purposes. Usage Data is generally retained for a shorter period, except when this data is used to strengthen the security or to improve the functionality of our Service, or we are legally obligated to retain this data for longer time periods.
7. Transfer of Data
Your information, including Personal Data, may be transferred to – and maintained on – computers located outside of your state, province, country or other governmental jurisdiction where the data protection laws may differ from those of your jurisdiction.
If you are located outside United States and choose to provide information to us, please note that we transfer the data, including Personal Data, to United States and process it there.
Your consent to this Privacy Policy followed by your submission of such information represents your agreement to that transfer.
True Homestead will take all the steps reasonably necessary to ensure that your data is treated securely and in accordance with this Privacy Policy and no transfer of your Personal Data will take place to an organisation or a country unless there are adequate controls in place including the security of your data and other personal information.
8. Disclosure of Data
We may disclose personal information that we collect, or you provide:
0.1. Disclosure for Law Enforcement.
Under certain circumstances, we may be required to disclose your Personal Data if required to do so by law or in response to valid requests by public authorities.
0.2. Business Transaction.
If we or our subsidiaries are involved in a merger, acquisition or asset sale, your Personal Data may be transferred.
0.3. Other cases. We may disclose your information also:
0.3.1. to our subsidiaries and affiliates;
0.3.2. to contractors, service providers, and other third parties we use to support our business;
0.3.3. to fulfill the purpose for which you provide it;
0.3.4. for the purpose of including your company’s logo on our website;
0.3.5. for any other purpose disclosed by us when you provide the information;
0.3.6. with your consent in any other cases;
0.3.7. if we believe disclosure is necessary or appropriate to protect the rights, property, or safety of the Company, our customers, or others.
9. Security of Data
The security of your data is important to us but remember that no method of transmission over the Internet or method of electronic storage is 100% secure. While we strive to use commercially acceptable means to protect your Personal Data, we cannot guarantee its absolute security.
10. Your Data Protection Rights Under General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)
If you are a resident of the European Union (EU) and European Economic Area (EEA), you have certain data protection rights, covered by GDPR.
We aim to take reasonable steps to allow you to correct, amend, delete, or limit the use of your Personal Data.
If you wish to be informed what Personal Data we hold about you and if you want it to be removed from our systems, please email us at benkkeller@yahoo.com.
In certain circumstances, you have the following data protection rights:
0.1. the right to access, update or to delete the information we have on you;
0.2. the right of rectification. You have the right to have your information rectified if that information is inaccurate or incomplete;
0.3. the right to object. You have the right to object to our processing of your Personal Data;
0.4. the right of restriction. You have the right to request that we restrict the processing of your personal information;
0.5. the right to data portability. You have the right to be provided with a copy of your Personal Data in a structured, machine-readable and commonly used format;
0.6. the right to withdraw consent. You also have the right to withdraw your consent at any time where we rely on your consent to process your personal information;
Please note that we may ask you to verify your identity before responding to such requests. Please note, we may not able to provide Service without some necessary data.
You have the right to complain to a Data Protection Authority about our collection and use of your Personal Data. For more information, please contact your local data protection authority in the European Economic Area (EEA).
11. Your Data Protection Rights under the California Privacy Protection Act (CalOPPA)
CalOPPA is the first state law in the nation to require commercial websites and online services to post a privacy policy. The law’s reach stretches well beyond California to require a person or company in the United States (and conceivable the world) that operates websites collecting personally identifiable information from California consumers to post a conspicuous privacy policy on its website stating exactly the information being collected and those individuals with whom it is being shared, and to comply with this policy.
According to CalOPPA we agree to the following:
0.1. users can visit our site anonymously;
0.2. our Privacy Policy link includes the word “Privacy”, and can easily be found on the home page of our website;
0.3. users will be notified of any privacy policy changes on our Privacy Policy Page;
0.4. users are able to change their personal information by emailing us at benkkeller@yahoo.com.
Our Policy on “Do Not Track” Signals:
We honor Do Not Track signals and do not track, plant cookies, or use advertising when a Do Not Track browser mechanism is in place. Do Not Track is a preference you can set in your web browser to inform websites that you do not want to be tracked.
You can enable or disable Do Not Track by visiting the Preferences or Settings page of your web browser.
12. Your Data Protection Rights under the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA)
If you are a California resident, you are entitled to learn what data we collect about you, ask to delete your data and not to sell (share) it. To exercise your data protection rights, you can make certain requests and ask us:
0.1. What personal information we have about you. If you make this request, we will return to you:
0.0.1. The categories of personal information we have collected about you.
0.0.2. The categories of sources from which we collect your personal information.
0.0.3. The business or commercial purpose for collecting or selling your personal information.
0.0.4. The categories of third parties with whom we share personal information.
0.0.5. The specific pieces of personal information we have collected about you.
0.0.6. A list of categories of personal information that we have sold, along with the category of any other company we sold it to. If we have not sold your personal information, we will inform you of that fact.
0.0.7. A list of categories of personal information that we have disclosed for a business purpose, along with the category of any other company we shared it with.
Please note, you are entitled to ask us to provide you with this information up to two times in a rolling twelve-month period. When you make this request, the information provided may be limited to the personal information we collected about you in the previous 12 months.
0.2. To delete your personal information. If you make this request, we will delete the personal information we hold about you as of the date of your request from our records and direct any service providers to do the same. In some cases, deletion may be accomplished through de-identification of the information. If you choose to delete your personal information, you may not be able to use certain functions that require your personal information to operate.
0.3. To stop selling your personal information. We don’t sell or rent your personal information to any third parties for any purpose. We do not sell your personal information for monetary consideration. However, under some circumstances, a transfer of personal information to a third party, or within our family of companies, without monetary consideration may be considered a “sale” under California law. You are the only owner of your Personal Data and can request disclosure or deletion at any time.
If you submit a request to stop selling your personal information, we will stop making such transfers.
Please note, if you ask us to delete or stop selling your data, it may impact your experience with us, and you may not be able to participate in certain programs or membership services which require the usage of your personal information to function. But in no circumstances, we will discriminate against you for exercising your rights.
To exercise your California data protection rights described above, please send your request(s) by email: benkkeller@yahoo.com.
Your data protection rights, described above, are covered by the CCPA, short for the California Consumer Privacy Act. To find out more, visit the official California Legislative Information website. The CCPA took effect on 01/01/2020.
13. Service Providers
We may employ third party companies and individuals to facilitate our Service (“Service Providers”), provide Service on our behalf, perform Service-related services or assist us in analysing how our Service is used.
These third parties have access to your Personal Data only to perform these tasks on our behalf and are obligated not to disclose or use it for any other purpose.
14. Analytics
We may use third-party Service Providers to monitor and analyze the use of our Service.
15. CI/CD tools
We may use third-party Service Providers to automate the development process of our Service.
16. Behavioral Remarketing
We may use remarketing services to advertise on third party websites to you after you visited our Service. We and our third-party vendors use cookies to inform, optimise and serve ads based on your past visits to our Service.
17. Payments
We may provide paid products and/or services within Service. In that case, we use third-party services for payment processing (e.g. payment processors).
We will not store or collect your payment card details. That information is provided directly to our third-party payment processors whose use of your personal information is governed by their Privacy Policy. These payment processors adhere to the standards set by PCI-DSS as managed by the PCI Security Standards Council, which is a joint effort of brands like Visa, Mastercard, American Express and Discover. PCI-DSS requirements help ensure the secure handling of payment information.
18. Links to Other Sites
Our Service may contain links to other sites that are not operated by us. If you click a third party link, you will be directed to that third party’s site. We strongly advise you to review the Privacy Policy of every site you visit.
We have no control over and assume no responsibility for the content, privacy policies or practices of any third party sites or services.
For example, the outlined Privacy Policy has been made using PolicyMaker.io, free tool that helps create high-quality legal documents. PolicyMaker’s free online privacy policy generator is an easy-to-use tool for creating a privacy policy for blog, website, e-commerce store or mobile app.
19. Children’s Privacy
Our Services are not intended for use by children under the age of 18 (“Child” or “Children”).
We do not knowingly collect personally identifiable information from Children under 18. If you become aware that a Child has provided us with Personal Data, please contact us. If we become aware that we have collected Personal Data from Children without verification of parental consent, we take steps to remove that information from our servers.
20. Changes to This Privacy Policy
We may update our Privacy Policy from time to time. We will notify you of any changes by posting the new Privacy Policy on this page.
We will let you know via email and/or a prominent notice on our Service, prior to the change becoming effective and update “effective date” at the top of this Privacy Policy.
You are advised to review this Privacy Policy periodically for any changes. Changes to this Privacy Policy are effective when they are posted on this page.
21. Contact Us
If you have any questions about this Privacy Policy, please contact us by email: benkkeller@yahoo.com.
Homestead, Florida, Vice Mayor Patricia Fairclough-Staggers committed election fraud by not living in the district she campaigned to represent.
It’s apparently the motive for all of her other schemes and crimes: save possibly for her financial problems; leading her to steal from school children and orphans.
Literally.
Keep reading.
Because lying is lying; and stealing is stealing.
First, we covered how, as vice mayor, Fairclough-Staggers sought to unseat Mayor Losner with a restraining order against him — allegedly for her safety —before withdrawing her statements and blaming her health instead.
But that was only after filing police reports against the mayor, and conveniently leaking it all to the Herald.
We reported how she attempted to have Doc Justice arrested for the crime of stalking, due to his heinous act of publishing articles as an investigative journalist, a clear First Amendment violation.
That made the tenth time Homestead officials have tried to abuse Doc with improper application of the stalking laws.
We uncovered how Fairclough-Staggers was essentially stealing money from the children she professes to care so much about, as well as her primary employer, the Public School system, by evading property taxes.
A reader claims to have submitted a complaint to the County Tax Appraiser, who confirmed she improperly claimed the tax exemption, and has issued a citation — another fraud necessary to cover the election fraud on paper.
We exposed her stealing from orphans, in an apparent scheme to embezzle money from her campaign here and here. And we detailed how she tried to cover her tracks after the fact while throwing shade at us here.
There is much more to the story of problems with her campaign finance reports, which is mentioned below, but it may become a whole new article.
We showed how she lied claiming she was single to commit mortgage fraud, sparking a criminal investigation against her — yet another ancillary fraud she committed to seal the election fraud deal.
Now, we’re letting the of the cat out of the bag by showing you the facts which show Homestead’s vice mayor committing election fraud.
Was it this or were her financial difficulties the primary motive for committing election fraud, and all her other fraudulent schemes?
As a Principal and Vice Mayor, how is she having financial difficulties?
THE FACTS AND ALLEGATIONS.
Every election cycle, political candidates from the local to state level face allegations that they don’t live in the districts they’re trying to represent.
And for Homestead Florida’s Vice Mayor, Patricia Fairclough-Staggers, 2019 is no different, even though, after the fact, she’s still sitting as Homestead’s vice mayor.
For now, at least.
Before winning an uncontested election for vice mayor of Homestead in 2019, Fairclough-Staggers claimed to reside at 424 SE 37 PL in Homestead, Florida 33033, which lies in the Oasis District, Seat 6.
There’s only a few problems with that.
A total of seven persons, six being registered voters, including Fairclough and her deceased mother, and one non-voter, claim to live at the exact same residence according to clustrmaps.com, all appearing to be her relatives.
Apparently, the four bedroom home where Fairclough-Staggers claims to reside is already full.
Meanwhile, a reasonable person would figure it is more likely Fairclough-Staggers, who recently had a baby, is living with her husband Kelvin Staggers who owns a residence at 1870 SE 20 TER in Homestead, Florida 33035. His residence lying within the Shores neighborhood of the Keys Gate District, i.e. Seat 2 represented by Councilman Sean Fletcher.
That is, unless we are to believe, contrary to word on the street and objective corroborating evidence, that a newly-wed new mother resides in a 4-bedroom town-home with five other people and her newborn — while living separately from her husband and the father of her child.
Plus, when she attempted to have Doc arrested for publishing an article about her husband on April 27, 2020, police did not take long to arrive at her husband’s address in the Shores.
No, they did not respond to her alleged address in the Oasis District.
The public records, as well as the dispatch call recordings, which we took the liberty of obtaining, corroborate our claim.
You can listen to the audio recording from dispatch below.
The voice you hear is, Homestead police lieutenant, Randy Owens.
What you heard is Owens stating the result of Vice Mayor Fairclough-Staggers calling Homestead Police Colonel Scott Kennedy urging police brass to manufacture a crime against Doc.
Police units were dispatched to her husband’s house in the Shores to conduct a “14,” police code for an investigation, to meet with Fairclough-Staggers.
Thankfully, the officers declined to abuse their authority, this time, and falsely charge Doc with a crime, since it’s perfectly legal to publish articles, especially articles about public officials doing things like committing crimes.
This creates serious problems for the Vice Mayor, brought on by her own crimes and misdeeds.
But we digress.
True Homestead has received multiple tips from local, anonymous sources who allege Fairclough-Staggers parks her car at her husband’s residence at night.
Sources revealed to True Homestead that this is an open secret, which many locals already know about.
And some have even been documenting it.
One source informed us the entire City Council knows the vice mayor does not reside in Oasis, and that Councilman Larry Roth has personally been to Staggers’s house in the Shores to conduct business, on multiple occasions.
We performed our due diligence, questioning the claims of all sources.
And we obtained time and date stamped photos showing Fairclough’s red Mercedes parked at her husband’s home in the Shores every time, except one, an anonymous source has ridden by and taken a picture.
Doc went on a night fishing trip with a friend who lives in the Shores, and Doc obtained two pictures himself.
Separate sources inform us, that during nights, Fairclough-Stagger’s car is never parked at or anywhere near the Oasis residence she swore to live in, in signed documents she submitted to the city clerk to qualify.
Multiple, trusted sources tell us she has been living in the Shores since before she got married in February 2018, one claiming this move was celebrated with a party back in 2016, and well before the 2019 election.
Additionally, a Doral police officer lives directly across the street from her husband’s house
This officer, our sources confirm, converses with the couple regularly.
Would that neighbor confirm our allegations, or would he lie under oath and/or during an investigation?
We don’t know, but we strongly suspect he would not.
Another source informed us, that well over a month ago, that someone filed a criminal complaint, with Miami-Dade State Attorney Katherine Fernandez-Rundle, after uncovering this election fraud themselves.
It is likely that multiple criminal investigations are currently ongoing.
Fairclough-Staggers may even face criminal charges stemming from that alleged complaint rather than what we’re informing you about.
But, that complaint has been just sitting at the State Attorney’s Office.
Will Fernandez-Rundle act on it?
That’s the $64,000 question.
We can’t tell you everything our sources inform us about or anything about their identities.
But we can confirm our sources allege that a private investigator was hired to tail Fairclough-Staggers for some time, before said complaint was filed.
That would provide any criminal case against her impartial third party evidence, which is separate and distinct from our many sources and the several lines of objective evidence we have obtained, and publish herein.
Yet, we have not published all of our evidence yet, as we want to protect sources from retaliation.
ADDITIONAL CLUES.
A barcode sticker can be observed on Fairclough’s car in the picture below.
The sticker allows entry through the gate at her husband’s residence in the Shores.
Only property owners and renters get a sticker, and all tenants who get a sticker get a background check.
And you have to sign off that you live there, as well.
Given all we’ve looked at in our own investigation, we have the utmost confidence that she actually lives in Keys Gate, not Oasis.
Gate records from both the Shores and Oasis addresses would further confirm or refute this, but we have been unable to obtain these records.
However, a subpoena would get them, along with her campaign bank account records which we are positive will uncover additional crimes.
THE CRIMES?
In order to qualify to campaign as a councilperson as well as vice mayor, Fairclough-Staggers was required to complete and then submit an application packet to Homestead City Clerk, and Supervisor of Elections, Elizabeth Sewell.
We confirmed Fairclough-Staggers, submitted the packet containing the required sworn and signed forms.
Yet, Fairclough had to know her signature on government documents claiming that she lived in Oasis, was false.
There’s only one problem with this, besides the fact that it’s not true.
When she signed the document containing information she knew to be false, she committed the crime of perjury.
These allegations, if true, constitute election fraud.
She knowingly lied about where she lives for personal gain.
Fairclough-Stagger’s deception and non-residence makes her ineligible to represent the Oasis District, as well as the Home Owners Association she sits on the board of too.
She has no real choice besides forfeiting her position as Vice Mayor as well.
ELECTION FRAUD VIA. FALSIFYING RESIDENCY NOT UNCOMMON IN SOUTH FLORIDA
A similar local case occurred as recently as 2017, when State Representative Daisy Baez admitted to lying about the district she resided in.
Prosecutors began investigating Baez after the Miami Herald published an article detailing how she did not live within the District she campaigned for.
In that case, investigators determined Baez lived in another district — and did not lease a property in the district she claimed to represent until after the article published.
Facing felony charges from the Miami-Dade State’s Attorney’s Office, Baez dropped out of her high-profile race for the State Senate.
The resignation came as part of a plea bargain, in which Baez plead guilty to a misdemeanor, paid a $1,000 fine, served a year of probation during which she was banned from seeking office, and was required to complete an ethics course, according to the Tampa Bay Times.
“Deliberately swearing to false information essential to your role as a state legislator, as alleged in this case, eats at the credibility of our voting and political systems,” Miami-Dade State Attorney Katherine Fernandez Rundle said in a statement a week after Baez resigned.
“I believe that there can never be a good reason for such action.”
So will Fernandez-Rundle do her job?
Or will she eat her words?
We are not holding our breath.
ONE CRIMINAL ACT COULD MEAN MULTIPLE CRIMINAL CHARGES
Whenever, a candidate signs a campaign finance report, they are affirming to have “read and certified” the information to be “true and correct.”
The forms are dummy proof, prompting the candidate to affirm their knowledge that it is a First Degree Misdemeanor to falsify a public record.
While we don’t know or have any control over what punishment, if any, her crimes will result in, we have read Florida Statutes that constitute other possible criminal charges which may be brought forward.
For instance, if candidates who are sitting public officials, such as Fairclough-Staggers, falsify an official record to provide a gain to any person, herself included, it could result in catching an official misconduct charge, a third degree felony, according to Florida Statute 838.022 (1) (a).
In the case of Baez, she was hit for submitting a singled falsified document.
That was enough for Fernandez-Rundle to bring felony charges before offering Baez a misdemeanor plea bargain.
Herein, Fairclough-Staggers falsified her residency information on twelve separate campaign finance reports that she lived at 424 SE 37 PL, an Oasis, not Keys Gate address — to remain qualified.
That’s in addition to intentionally lying on her candidate qualifying packet.
That is a baker’s dozen worth of violations right there, alone.
Such is why Fairclough perpetrated the Homestead Tax Exemption and the Mortgage fraud. Because, if she lost the home or the exemption, the gig would be up generating a public record, as well as negative publicity.
THE CAMPAIGN REPORTS ARE STILL A MESS
The one time Fairclough-Staggers was not at home when our anonymous source passed by was on June 23, 2020.
That day, she was at the Clerk’s office submitting an amended P1 report, even though all accounts were supposed to be closed out in February.
The report was submitted at 6:41 pm, yeah that seems a little late for the clerk’s office to be receiving and stamping documents.
Was overtime charged to the City to deal with the Vice Mayor’s malfeasance, misfeasance, and/or non-feasance?
Further, Fairclough-Staggers used the wrong address again.
There are many other apparent errors in these reports, including the amended P1, which just makes every subsequent filing even worse.
At this point $7,125.49, by Fairclough’s own sworn admission, is unaccounted for, and we still are not sure as to what happened to the $2,000 which was supposed to go to orphans being helped by Keisha.
Sadly, Keisha never got anything from Fairclough-Staggers other than to be used for political gain or cover.
Where are these $7,125.49 in missing funds, are they sitting in a bank account, or were they misappropriated, i.e. stolen/embezzled?
How did Elizabeth Sewell, the City Clerk and Supervisor of Elections, allow this to occur, on her watch, and why does she allow this to continue?
Altogether, there is a total of at least sixteen (16), prima facie, third degree felonies uncovered to date, against Fairclough-Staggers.
That comes with up to eighty (80) years worth of prison time, and it does not include the mortgage fraud, a second degree felony which threatens up to another fifteen (15) years of incarceration.
That’s up to ninety five (95) years worth of incarceration for felony crimes, and $90,000 in fines, already uncovered.
This is way more than the Feds ever on Al Capone.
BUT WAIT THERE’S MORE
When, and if, Fairclough-Staggers submits the other eight (8) amended documents now required, that will be eight (8) additional third degree felonies, unless she decides to use the correct address where she resides.
That’s up to an additional forty (40) years and $40,000 in fines, in addition to what is already documented above.
We know she would never receive a fraction of this, it must be nice to have friends in high places, however, she is now ineligible to sit on the dais.
Period.
We state that with great confidence.
And God only knows what would be found if law enforcement submitted a subpoena for her bank records, or her emails and texts.
Fernandez-Rundle went after Daisey Baez for much less.
Will Fernandez-Rundle hold Fairclough-Staggers to a different standard?
Only time will tell.
Stay tuned as we will be exposing more local officials, as well as quasi-governmental agencies, soon…
Homestead, Florida, Vice Mayor Patricia Fairclough-Staggers committed election fraud by not living in the district she campaigned to represent.
It’s apparently the motive for all of her other schemes and crimes: save possibly for her financial problems; leading her to steal from school children and orphans.
Literally.
Keep reading.
Because lying is lying; and stealing is stealing.
First, we covered how, as vice mayor, Fairclough-Staggers sought to unseat Mayor Losner with a restraining order against him — allegedly for her safety —before withdrawing her statements and blaming her health instead.
But that was only after filing police reports against the mayor, and conveniently leaking it all to the Herald.
We reported how she attempted to have Doc Justice arrested for the crime of stalking, due to his heinous act of publishing articles as an investigative journalist, a clear First Amendment violation.
That made the tenth time Homestead officials have tried to abuse Doc with improper application of the stalking laws.
We uncovered how Fairclough-Staggers was essentially stealing money from the children she professes to care so much about, as well as her primary employer, the Miami-Dade County Public School system, by evading property taxes.
A reader claims to have submitted a complaint to the County Tax Appraiser, who confirmed she improperly claimed the tax exemption, and has issued a citation — another fraud necessary to cover the election fraud on paper.
We exposed her stealing from orphans, in an apparent scheme to embezzle money from her campaign here and here. And we detailed how she tried to cover her tracks after the fact while throwing shade at us here.
There is much more to the story of problems with her campaign finance reports, which is mentioned below, but that may become a whole new article.
We showed how she lied claiming she was single to commit mortgage fraud, sparking a criminal investigation against her — yet another ancillary fraud she committed to seal the election fraud deal.
Now, we’re letting the of the cat out of the bag by showing you the facts which show Homestead’s vice mayor committing election fraud.
Was it this or were her financial difficulties the primary motive for committing election fraud, and all her other fraudulent schemes?
As a Principal and Vice Mayor, how is she having financial difficulties?
THE FACTS AND ALLEGATIONS.
Every election cycle, political candidates from the local to state level face allegations that they don’t live in the districts they’re trying to represent.
And for Homestead Florida’s Vice Mayor, Patricia Fairclough-Staggers, 2019 is no different, even though, after the fact, she’s still sitting as Homestead’s vice mayor.
For now, at least.
Before winning an uncontested election for vice mayor of Homestead in 2019, Fairclough-Staggers claimed to reside at 424 SE 37 PL in Homestead, Florida 33033, which lies in the Oasis District, Seat 6.
There’s only a few problems with that.
A total of seven persons, six being registered voters, including Fairclough and her deceased mother, and one non-voter, claim to live at the exact same residence according to voting records and clustrmaps.com, all appearing to be her relatives.
Apparently, the four bedroom home where Fairclough-Staggers claims to reside is already full.
Meanwhile, a reasonable person would figure it is more likely Fairclough-Staggers, who recently had a baby, is living with her husband Kelvin Staggers who owns a residence at 1870 SE 20 Terrace, Homestead, Florida 33035. His residence lying within the Shores neighborhood of the Keys Gate District, i.e. Seat 2 represented by Councilman Sean Fletcher.
That is, unless we are to believe, contrary to word on the street and the objective corroborating evidence, that a newly-wed new mother resides in a 4-bedroom town-home with five other people and her newborn — while living separately from her husband and the father of her child.
Plus, when she attempted to have Doc arrested for publishing an article about her husband on April 27, 2020, police did not take long to arrive at her husband’s address in the Shores.
No, they did not respond to her alleged address in the Oasis District.
The public records, as well as the dispatch call recordings, which we took the liberty of obtaining, corroborate our claim.
You can listen to the audio recording from dispatch below.
The voice you hear is, Homestead police lieutenant, Randy Owens.
What you heard is Owens stating the result of Vice Mayor Fairclough-Staggers calling Homestead Police Colonel Scott Kennedy urging police brass to manufacture a crime against Doc.
Police units were dispatched to her husband’s house in the Shores to conduct a “14,” police code for an investigation, to meet with Fairclough-Staggers.
Thankfully, the officers declined to abuse their authority, this time, and falsely charge Doc with a crime, since it’s perfectly legal to publish articles, especially articles about public officials doing things like committing crimes.
This creates serious problems for the Vice Mayor, brought on by her own misdeeds.
But we digress.
True Homestead has received multiple tips from local, anonymous sources who allege Fairclough-Staggers parks her car at her husband’s residence at night.
Sources revealed to True Homestead that this is an open secret, which many locals already know about.
And some have even been documenting it.
One source informed us the entire City Council knows the vice mayor does not reside in Oasis, and that Councilman Larry Roth has personally been to Staggers’s house in the Shores to conduct business, on multiple occasions.
We performed our due diligence, questioning the claims of all sources, to the fullest extent we were able to without having subpoena powers.
And we obtained time and date stamped photos showing Fairclough’s red Mercedes parked at her husband’s home in the Shores every time, except one, an anonymous source has ridden by and taken a picture.
Also, Doc went on a night time deep sea fishing trip with a friend who lives in the Shores and, having to drive right past her house twice, Doc obtained two pictures himself. One on the way in, and one going out.
Out of the 12 times (10 by our source and 2 by Doc) we drove past and took pictures, all on different dates, between May 22, 2020 and June 29, 2020, her car was there 11 times, including overnight.
The one time she wasn’t there was on June 23, was when she was in the Clerk’s Office at City Hall, filing an amended P1 report, at 6:41 pm. But that’s another fiasco.
Further, Separate sources inform us, that during nights, Fairclough-Stagger’s car is never parked at or anywhere near the Oasis residence she swore to live in, in signed documents she submitted to the city clerk to qualify.
And, multiple, trusted sources tell us she has been living in the Shores since before she got married in February 2018, one claiming this move was celebrated with a party back in 2016, well before the 2019 election.
Additionally, a Doral police officer lives directly across the street from her husband’s house
This officer, our sources confirm, converses with the couple regularly.
Would that neighbor confirm our allegations, or would he lie under oath and/or during an investigation?
We don’t know, but we strongly suspect he would not.
Another source informed us, that well over a month ago, someone filed a criminal complaint, with Miami-Dade State Attorney Katherine Fernandez-Rundle, after uncovering this election fraud independently themselves.
It is likely that multiple criminal investigations are currently ongoing.
Fairclough-Staggers may even face criminal charges stemming from this other alleged complaint rather than what we’re informing you about.
But, that complaint has been just sitting at the State Attorney’s Office collecting dust.
Will Fernandez-Rundle act on it?
That’s the $64,000 question.
We can’t tell you everything our sources inform us about or anything about their identities.
But we can confirm our sources allege that a private investigator was hired to tail Fairclough-Staggers for some time, before said complaint was filed.
That would provide any criminal case against her impartial third party evidence, which is separate and distinct from our many sources and the several lines of objective evidence we have obtained, and publish herein.
Yet, we have not published all of our evidence yet, as we want to protect sources from retaliation.
ADDITIONAL CLUES.
A barcode sticker can be observed on Fairclough’s car in the picture below.
The sticker allows entry through the gate at her husband’s residence in the Shores.
Only property owners and renters get a sticker, and all tenants who get a sticker have get a background check.
And you have to sign off that you live there, as well.
Given all we’ve looked at in our own investigation, we have the utmost confidence that she actually lives in Keys Gate, not Oasis.
Gate records from both the Shores and Oasis addresses would further confirm or refute this, but we have been unable to obtain these records.
However, a subpoena would get them, along with her campaign bank account records which we are positive will uncover additional crimes.
The problem is that the “Fraudfather,” Wayne Rosen, controls the Shores, and could have those records destroyed. However, that could tie Rosen into these frauds of Fairclough-Staggers as, after her, he has the most to lose.
THE CRIMES?
In order to qualify to campaign as a councilperson as well as vice mayor, Fairclough-Staggers was required to complete and then submit an application packet to Homestead City Clerk, and Supervisor of Elections, Elizabeth Sewell.
We confirmed Fairclough-Staggers, submitted the packet containing the required sworn and signed forms.
Yet, Fairclough had to know her signature on government documents claiming that she lived in Oasis, was false.
There’s only one problem with this, besides the fact that it’s not true.
When she signed the document containing information she knew to be false, she committed the crime of perjury.
These allegations, if true, constitute election fraud.
She knowingly lied about where she lives for personal gain.
Fairclough-Stagger’s deception and non-residence makes her ineligible to represent the Oasis District, as well as the Home Owners Association she sits on the board of too.
She has no real choice besides forfeiting her position as Vice Mayor as well.
The question now is: will she leave on her own free will, or will she be dragged out?
ELECTION FRAUD VIA. FALSIFYING RESIDENCY NOT UNCOMMON IN SOUTH FLORIDA
A similar local case occurred as recently as 2017, when State Representative Daisy Baez admitted to lying about the district she resided in.
Prosecutors began investigating Baez after the Miami Herald published an article detailing how she did not live within the District she campaigned for.
In that case, investigators determined Baez lived in another district — and did not lease a property in the district she claimed to represent until after the article published.
Facing felony charges from the Miami-Dade State’s Attorney’s Office, Baez dropped out of her high-profile race for the State Senate.
The resignation came as part of a plea bargain, in which Baez plead guilty to a misdemeanor, paid a $1,000 fine, served a year of probation during which she was banned from seeking office, and was required to complete an ethics course, according to the Tampa Bay Times.
“Deliberately swearing to false information essential to your role as a state legislator, as alleged in this case, eats at the credibility of our voting and political systems,” Miami-Dade State Attorney Katherine Fernandez Rundle said in a statement a week after Baez resigned.
“I believe that there can never be a good reason for such action.”
So will Fernandez-Rundle do her job?
Or will she eat her words?
We are not holding our breath.
ONE CRIMINAL ACT COULD MEAN MULTIPLE CRIMINAL CHARGES
Whenever, a candidate signs a campaign finance report, they are affirming to have “read and certified” the information to be “true and correct.”
The forms are dummy proof, prompting the candidate to affirm their knowledge that it is a First Degree Misdemeanor to falsify a public record.
While we don’t know or have any control over what punishment, if any, her crimes will result in, we have read Florida Statutes that constitute other possible criminal charges which may be brought forward.
For instance, if candidates who are sitting public officials, such as Fairclough-Staggers, falsify an official record to knowingly and intentionally obtain a benefit for any person, herself included, it could result in catching an official misconduct charge, a third degree felony, according to Florida Statute 838.022 (1) (a).
In the case of Baez, she was hit for submitting a single falsified document.
That was enough for Fernandez-Rundle to bring felony charges before offering Baez a misdemeanor plea bargain.
In contrast, Fairclough-Staggers falsified her residency information on twelve separate campaign finance reports that she lived at 424 SE 37 PL, an Oasis, not Keys Gate address — to remain qualified.
That’s in addition to intentionally lying on her candidate qualifying packet.
That is a baker’s dozen worth of violations right there, alone.
This is apparently why Fairclough perpetrated the Homestead Tax Exemption and the Mortgage fraud. Because, if she lost the home or the exemption, the gig would be up generating a public record of such, as well as negative publicity.
THE CAMPAIGN REPORTS ARE STILL A MESS
As stated above, the one time Fairclough-Staggers was not at home when our anonymous source passed by was on June 23, 2020.
That day, she was at the Clerk’s office submitting an amended P1 report, even though all accounts were supposed to be closed out in February.
The report was submitted at 6:41 pm, yeah that seems a little late for the clerk’s office to be receiving and stamping documents, to us too.
Was overtime charged to the City to deal with the Vice Mayor’s malfeasance, misfeasance, and/or non-feasance? The City has refuted this, but we will see.
Further, Fairclough-Staggers used the wrong address again.
There are many other apparent errors in these reports, including the amended P1, which just makes every subsequent filing even worse.
At this point $7,125.49, by Fairclough’s own sworn admissions, is unaccounted for, and we still are not sure as to what happened to the $2,000 which was supposed to go to orphans being helped by Keisha.
Later Fairclough claimed to have later given this money to Lawanda Bragg, her former relative in-law in April, but still hasn’t corrected her reports to reflect this yet.
Sadly, Keisha’s orphans never got a penny from Fairclough-Staggers, but Keisha did get used for political gain and cover, while Fairclough jeopardized legally and financially someone she calls a friend.
But again we digress.
Where are these $7,125.49 in missing funds, are they sitting in a bank account, or were they misappropriated, i.e. stolen/embezzled?
How did Elizabeth Sewell, the City Clerk and Supervisor of Elections, allow this to occur, on her watch, and why does she allow this to continue?
Altogether, there is a total of at least sixteen (16), prima facie, third degree felonies we have uncovered to date, against Fairclough-Staggers.
That comes with up to eighty (80) years worth of prison time, and it does not include the mortgage fraud, a second degree felony which threatens up to another fifteen (15) years of incarceration.
That’s up to ninety five (95) years worth of incarceration for felony crimes, and $90,000 in fines in total, already uncovered.
This is way more than the Feds ever on Al Capone.
BUT WAIT THERE’S MORE
When, and if, Fairclough-Staggers submits the other eight (8) amended documents now required, that will be eight (8) additional third degree felonies, unless she decides to use the correct address where she resides.
That’s up to an additional forty (40) years and $40,000 in fines, in addition to what is already documented above.
This does not even include the problems she is about to have with the elections commission.
We know she would never receive a fraction of this, if she receives any real punishment at all, it must be nice to have friends in high places.
However, she is now ineligible to sit on the dais, period.
We state that with the utmost confidence.
And God only knows what would be found if law enforcement submitted a subpoena for her bank records, gate entry logs, and/or her emails and texts.
Fernandez-Rundle went after Daisey Baez for much less.
Will Fernandez-Rundle hold Fairclough-Staggers to a different standard?
Only time will tell.
Stay tuned as we will be exposing more local officials, and agencies, soon…
We have posted a few times about Representative Kionne McGhee, including his involvement in a felonious charity donation flyer, which we have written about and will write more about later, particularly how he is unlawfully refusing to provide public records related to that.
Right now though we want to share some things which were sent to us.
THE SLUMLORD?
It seems the McGhee has all the attributes of a slumlord.
McGhee was recently cited for code violations on one of his properties.
McGhee received a citation for having no running water, and having performed non-permitted remodeling of the kitchen and bathroom, which are human safety violations.
But when you are in power you can get cocky and arrogant, and begin thinking that you are above the law, and can get away with anything.
THE COMPETITION…
The recent allegations sent to us do not focus solely on having unsafe
conditions on his property, but also to him stiffing a working man.
Ironically, the man stiffed is his competition Johnny Farias.
To be clear McGhee is also running against two other candidates, Marlon Hill and Mark Coats, as seen in this Florida Politics article.
True Homestead welcomes any of these candidates to sit down with us and tell our readers why they should vote for them, or any local politician for that matter.
Accurately informing our readers on all candidates is more important than
any ideology. Our readers are smart, and if properly informed will always make the right choice.
But I digress.
THE DEADBEAT?
McGhee owns a property at 621 SW 12th Avenue in Homestead, Florida.
Farias, an electrician and owner of Electrical Masters Inc., performed work for McGhee at this property as seen in the the final inspection.
McGhee was apparently trying to stiff Farias, before Farias had to place a lien on McGhee’s property, as seen in the text exchange below.
Pay close attention to the time line here.
On January 23rd, the final inspection is done, then on the 31st Farias ask when they can settle the balance.
McGhee replies three days later on February 3rd, that he will settle up that
week.
Eight days later on February 11th, then again on February 14th, Farias requests final payment.
McGhee responds back on the 14th stating he will contact Farias the same day about payment.
Five days later on the 19th, Farias again pleads for payment.
Finally, on June 16th, 2020, four months later after the last communication, McGhee responds trying to throw shade at Farias for putting a lien on his properties, while making veiled political threats.
Unless we are missing something, and there were other communications, it seems pretty clear that McGhee was playing the shuck and jive hustle, something anyone living in Miami-Dade for any time has seen repeatedly.
We will let you make you own decisions based on the evidence here.
But we are happy to listen to McGhee’s side, the thing is he is just too afraid
to respond to me, though he goes around trying to build support to shut True Homestead down.
In the interest of full disclosure, I must note that Farias was the only person trying to help when Felipe Hemming, Ben Keller and I uncovered and published that one of my Defendants, Luis Gomez, and his wife had defrauded the section 8 voucher program out of over $120,000 of your tax dollars. Sadly, it seems no one else including Miami-Dade Police Department cared.
That story will be updated soon. However, in contrast when I was investigating crimes committed through McGhee’s office, McGhee deliberately worked against and thwarted my efforts at transparency.
What does McGhee have to hide?
Doc Justice
Just over a month after fatally shooting a fleeing man in the back who witnesses say had his hands up, a Florida cop was not placed on leave. Instead he was promoted and given a raise.
When Homestead cop Anthony Green shot the sixth person of his career as a cop on July 16, 2015, killing 35-year-old Edward Foster, he was not taken off the street, demoted, or disciplined.
He wasn’t even placed on administrative leave.
Of the six people shot by Green, five of the victims were black.
A SERIAL KILLER WITH A BADGE?
A serial killer is someone who kills three people over the span of more than a month with an emotional cooling off period in between each killing, according to the FBI.
The National Institute of Justice defines a serial killer as someone who commits two or more murders with sadistic sexual overtones or with psychological motives.
But not all serial killers have sexual motives.
Some are motivated by anger and hatred or other things.
The Zodiac serial killer was motivated by his ability to terrorize a city and gain fame.
Alexander Pichushkin stated he killed because it made him feel like God.
“In all cases, I killed for only one reason. I killed in order to live because when you kill, you want to live.”
The Oxford Dictionary describes a more standard definition of what constitutes a serial killer.
“A person who commits a series of murders, often with no apparent motive and typically following a characteristic, predictable behavior pattern..”
While investigating for this story, we discovered a writ of quo warranto filed by Ernest M. Flowers in the Supreme Court of Florida on October 8, 2018, that indicates officer Green might have a sadistic side going back decades.
An investigator from the Public Defender’s office confirmed pictures taken by Flowers showed evidence of injuries he sustained while handcuffed and beaten by Green support his claim that while handcuffed Green beat him with a baton, and kicked and punched him all while Flowers was handcuffed on the ground.
“I’m sick of you n—-rs trying to rob people,” Green said, before allowing two of the alleged victims to kick and punch Flowers before coercing a false confession out of Flowers.
You can read the entire writ below.
WITNESSES SAY FOSTER WAS NOT A THREAT
Foster was on his way home from buying dog food at around 4 p.m. when Green and another officer, responding to a 911 call about a man with a gun, rolled up in their patrol cruisers, and confronted him.
Witnesses at the scene stated Green did not have a gun or pose a threat to the officers. Rather, they say, he fled shortly before Green unloaded his clip into Edwards’ back from inside his car.
Witness statements coupled with ballistic evidence makes it difficult to fathom officer Green fearing for his life from inside the car.
AN INVESTIGATION, LIES, AND LIES ABOUT AN INVESTIGATION.
For nearly a year after Foster’s death, Chief Rolle lied to Edward Foster’s surviving family, telling them that officer Green had been placed on administrative leave.
But that was a lie.
The Foster family would only discover Chief Rolle’s deceit when someone in the department leaked the information to them before a council meeting.
At the council meeting, Crystal Foster observed Rolle taking the officer who leaked the truth into a side room to lecture and scold them.
As of June 27, 2020, the Foster family still has no answers or justice.
After five years, the Miami-Dade State Attorney’s Office probe into his shooting remains open, which has made it impossible for the Foster family’s attorney to gather evidence.
Dragging out an investigation over years is a common tactic police departments use to hamstring families and their lawyers seeking justice for family members wrongly killed by police.
While investigators from Homestead Police Department, the FDLE, the Miami-Dade State Attorney’s Office and the Miami-Dade Police Department have all had a hand in the investigation, the Foster family says no real effort has been made to find answers for the past five years.
INTIMIDATION TACTICS
One member of the Foster family was friends with Antrel Rolle, who happens to be an NFL football player, and Chief Rolle’s son.
Approximately two years after Green fatally shot Foster, Chief Rolle, who never bothered expressing condolences to the family, had his son, Antrel, call his old friend, the brother of Crystal Foster, who has been the most vocal asking questions and speaking out against what happened to her brother.
Antrel relayed the message over the phone saying his dad was not the one who killed his brother and said something to the effect of “tell your sister to back off,” Crystal Foster told True Homestead in a telephone interview.
Eventually, Chief Rolle got on the phone asking something along the lines of “why are they after me? I didn’t kill your brother.”
Rolle didn’t kill Foster. But he promoted the officer who did, and lied about him being on administrative leave for nearly a year.
Crystal and Adrina Foster and their mother would show up to city council meetings after the shooting to redress their grievances.
“During every council meeting for almost a year, they said Green was suspended,” Crystal Foster told True Homestead.
“With any justice at all, any time you have a shooting, and there’s a murder, there’s no reason an officer should be on the streets with an open and ongoing investigation,” Crystal Foster told True Homestead.
“What makes it justifiable for Green to still be on the streets? What if I run into him? What am I supposed to say?”
This begs the questions.
What else are they lying about?
Why are they lying?
And why are officials in Homestead covering for someone who is statistically an obvious threat and liability to the community?
DEADLY FORCE STATISTICS
The vast majority of police officers work their entire careers without ever using the option of deadly force.
Since 2015, police officers across the United States have killed around 1,000 people per year using deadly force, according to the Washinton Post.
With about 800,000 officers in the country, that amounts to .125 percent of officers electing to use deadly force.
That’s half of a quarter of one percent each year.
To view it from another perspective a survey conducted by Pew Research shows that only about 1 in 4 officers ever have to fire their weapon during their career.
Extrapolating this statistic to Green shooting six men all at different times has odds of roughly 1 in 4,000, or a 0.025%, chance of being involved in this many shootings.
I think we identified the mythical “less than 1 % of officers are bad” in officer Green.
Even if we assume everyone of Green’s shooting was justified, and we ignore some highly questionable facts, he is still a liability to the city.
Yet, why is Chief Rolle defending a killer cop and putting lives at risk?
How can he allow a walking, ticking time bomb to remain on the streets with 100% impunity?
What’s to stop an officer who has shot six people without consequence from shooting seven, eight or nine?
Why has the investigation gone on so long?
Why are witnesses reluctant to speak about what they saw?
These are all questions we will be covering in next week’s follow up story about why a rogue cop is still on the streets, terrorizing members of the Homestead community.
Sign the petition to fire and charge officer Green below.
